{
  "author": "Ann-Helena Hokkanen; Mathilde Coutant; Mari Heinonen; Marianna Norring; Magdy Adam; Claudio Oliviero; Tiina Bergqvist; Anna Valros",
  "citations": [
    {
      "raw_text": "Hokkanen et al. Porcine Health Management (2025) 11:21 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40813-025-00428-7",
      "title": "Two restraining devices in connection to surgical castration with or without local anesthesia: effects on piglet stress",
      "authors": "Ann-Helena Hokkanen; Mathilde Coutant; Mari Heinonen; Marianna Norring; Magdy Adam; Claudio Oliviero; Tiina Bergqvist; Anna Valros",
      "publication_year": 2025,
      "doi": "10.1186/s40813-025-00428-7",
      "url": "https://doi.org/10.1186/s40813-025-00428-7",
      "confidence": 1
    }
  ],
  "confidence": 1,
  "doc_type": "Research Open Access",
  "id": 101,
  "language": "English",
  "publication_date": "2025",
  "source_type": "file",
  "source_uri": "file:///home/pi/welfare_docs/Old docs/1_Specific Product Assurance/Trisolfen/Pig Castration/Studies/s40813-025-00428-7.pdf",
  "summary": "This study compared two restraining devices (tubular bench vs. castration rack) and local anaesthesia (LA) vs. sham injections on piglet stress during castration. The tubular bench was more aversive, and while LA reduced pain during castration, its injection was painful.",
  "title": "Two restraining devices in connection to surgical castration with or without local anesthesia: effects on piglet stress"
}