{
  "author": "Terézia Hegerová; Peter Juhás",
  "citations": [
    {
      "raw_text": "Bee, G., B. Aluwé, M. Bonneau, M. C. B. de Koning, M. D. F. M. van der Fels-Klerx, A. M. F. van der Peet-Schwering, and M. C. M. van de Weerd. 2015. Alternatives to surgical castration in pigs: a review. Animal 9(12): 1953–1968.",
      "title": "Alternatives to surgical castration in pigs: a review",
      "authors": "G. Bee; B. Aluwé; M. Bonneau; M. C. B. de Koning; M. D. F. M. van der Fels-Klerx; A. M. F. van der Peet-Schwering; M. C. M. van de Weerd",
      "publication_year": 2015
    }
  ],
  "confidence": 1,
  "doc_type": "Review",
  "id": 88,
  "language": "English",
  "publication_date": "2021-03-31",
  "source_type": "file",
  "source_uri": "file:///home/pi/welfare_docs/Old docs/1_Specific Product Assurance/Trisolfen/Pig Castration/Studies/a19b4cf4025cf0a5e2d467c6537768e3fa0c.pdf",
  "summary": "This review examines alternatives to surgical castration in piglets, such as immunocastration, raising entire male pigs, and castration with anaesthesia/analgesia. It discusses their pros and cons, including cost, animal welfare, meat quality, and consumer acceptance.",
  "title": "Castration and alternatives in pig: advantages and disadvantages"
}