{
  "author": "Ann-Helena Hokkanen; Mathilde Coutant; Mari Heinonen; Marianna Norring; Magdy Adam; Claudio Oliviero; Tiina Bergqvist; Anna Valros",
  "citations": [
    {
      "raw_text": "Hokkanen et al. Porcine Health Management (2025) 11:21 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40813-025-00428-7",
      "title": "Two restraining devices in connection to surgical castration with or without local anesthesia: effects on piglet stress",
      "authors": "Ann-Helena Hokkanen; Mathilde Coutant; Mari Heinonen; Marianna Norring; Magdy Adam; Claudio Oliviero; Tiina Bergqvist; Anna Valros",
      "publication_year": 2025,
      "doi": "10.1186/s40813-025-00428-7",
      "url": "https://doi.org/10.1186/s40813-025-00428-7",
      "confidence": 1
    }
  ],
  "confidence": 0.95,
  "doc_type": "Research Open Access",
  "id": 34,
  "language": "English",
  "publication_date": "2025",
  "source_type": "file",
  "source_uri": "file:///home/pi/welfare_docs/Animals Assured/Research/Pig Castrate/s40813-025-00428-7.pdf",
  "summary": "This study compared two restraining devices (tubular bench vs. castration rack) and local anaesthesia (LA) vs. sham injections on 179 piglets during castration. LA reduced pain during castration but was painful itself. The tubular bench was more aversive than the castration rack.",
  "title": "Two restraining devices in connection to surgical castration with or without local anesthesia: effects on piglet stress"
}