This document provides foundational methodological guidelines and quantitative assessment standards for implementing the Welfare Footprint Framework (WFF). The guidelines outlined herein serve as a practical reference for conducting systematic, evidence-based measurement of animal welfare impacts, facilitating decision-making and benchmarking across sectors. This core documentation should be cited as: Alonso, W. J., & Schuck-Paim, C. (2025). Welfare Footprint Framework: Methodological Foundations and Quantitative Assessment Guidelines. Center for Welfare Metrics (Sao Paulo). https://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/94bxs 1 Summary................................................................................................................................. 3 Innovative Tools and Metrics....................................................................................................4 Introduction............................................................................................................................. 5 Trademark Usage and Requirements........................................................................................ 6 Core Framework Components.................................................................................................. 6 Intraspecific Analyses............................................................................................................ 12 Definition of Analytical Boundaries........................................................................................ 12 I. Zootechnical Description..........................................................................................................13 II. Veterinary
Animal Protection Law
Filters
…the dispute in accordance with the Mediation Rules of the Law Society of New South Wales and the President of the Law Society of New South Wales or the President's nominee…
…Since 2021, surgical piglet castration must be performed with complete pain elimination according to the Animal Protection Law in Germany. General anaesthesia by isoflurane inhalation, which can be performed by the farmer…
…Since 2021, surgical piglet castration must be performed with complete pain elimination according to the Animal Protection Law in Germany. General anaesthesia by isoflurane inhalation, which can be performed by the farmer…
anish Policy for Animal Protection RD53/2013, meeting countries, and where available, existing live-attenuated or the European Union Directive 2010/63 on the protection of scab-based vaccines may revert to…
nd Public Health Act. julho 11). https:/ /www.cong ress.gov/ bill/118th-congress/house-bi ll/8994 (2024). 11. Delsart, M., Pol, F., Dufour, B., Rose, N. & Fablet, C. Pig farming in alternative systems: strengths and challenges in terms of animal welfare, biosecurity, animal health and pork safety. Agriculture 10 (7), 261 (2020). 12. Fonseca, R. P. & Sanchez-Sabate, R. Consumers’ attitudes towards animal suffering: A systematic review on awareness, willingness and dietary change. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 19 (23), 16372 (2022). 13. Hötzel, M. J., Yunes, M. C., Vandresen, B., Albernaz-Gonçalves, R. & Woodroffe, R. E. On the road to end pig pain: knowledge and attitudes of Brazilian citizens regarding castration. Animals 10 (10), 1826.12 (2020). 14. Raja, S. N. et al. The revised international association for the study of pain definition of pain: concepts, challenges, and compromises. Pain 161, 1976–1982 (2020). 15. Rault, J. L., Lay, D. C. & Marchant, J. N. Castration induced pain in pigs and other livestock. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 135, 214–225 (2011). 16. McGlone, J. J., Nicholson, R. I., Hellman, J. M. & Herzog, D. N. The development of pain in young pigs associated with castration and attempts to prevent castration-induced behavioral changes. J. Anim. Sci. 71, 1441–1446 (1993). 17. Torrey, S., Devillers, N., Lessard, M., Farmer, C. & Widowski, T. Effect of age on the behavioral and physiological responses of piglets to tail Docking and ear Notching. J. Anim. Sci. 87, 1778–1786 (2009). 18. Telles, F. G., Luna, S. P. L., Teixeira, G. & Berto, D.
nd Public Health Act. julho 11). https:/ /www.cong ress.gov/ bill/118th-congress/house-bi ll/8994 (2024). 11. Delsart, M., Pol, F., Dufour, B., Rose, N. & Fablet, C. Pig farming in alternative systems: strengths and challenges in terms of animal welfare, biosecurity, animal health and pork safety. Agriculture 10 (7), 261 (2020). 12. Fonseca, R. P. & Sanchez-Sabate, R. Consumers’ attitudes towards animal suffering: A systematic review on awareness, willingness and dietary change. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 19 (23), 16372 (2022). 13. Hötzel, M. J., Yunes, M. C., Vandresen, B., Albernaz-Gonçalves, R. & Woodroffe, R. E. On the road to end pig pain: knowledge and attitudes of Brazilian citizens regarding castration. Animals 10 (10), 1826.12 (2020). 14. Raja, S. N. et al. The revised international association for the study of pain definition of pain: concepts, challenges, and compromises. Pain 161, 1976–1982 (2020). 15. Rault, J. L., Lay, D. C. & Marchant, J. N. Castration induced pain in pigs and other livestock. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 135, 214–225 (2011). 16. McGlone, J. J., Nicholson, R. I., Hellman, J. M. & Herzog, D. N. The development of pain in young pigs associated with castration and attempts to prevent castration-induced behavioral changes. J. Anim. Sci. 71, 1441–1446 (1993). 17. Torrey, S., Devillers, N., Lessard, M., Farmer, C. & Widowski, T. Effect of age on the behavioral and physiological responses of piglets to tail Docking and ear Notching. J. Anim. Sci. 87, 1778–1786 (2009). 18. Telles, F. G., Luna, S. P. L., Teixeira, G. & Berto, D.
itek, J.; Candek-Potokar, M.; Djekic, I.; Getya, A.; Guerrero, L.; Ivanova, S.; Kusec, G.; Nakov, D.; et al. Attitudes and beliefs of eastern european consumers towards animal welfare. Animals 2020, 10, 17. [CrossRef] [PubMed] © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
itek, J.; Candek-Potokar, M.; Djekic, I.; Getya, A.; Guerrero, L.; Ivanova, S.; Kusec, G.; Nakov, D.; et al. Attitudes and beliefs of eastern european consumers towards animal welfare. Animals 2020, 10, 17. [CrossRef] [PubMed] © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
ps://www.bmel.de, accessed on 25 May 2022) based on a decision of the Parliament of the Federal Republic of Germany, granted by the Federal Office for Agriculture and Food (BLE, https://www.ble.de, accessed on 25 May 2022 grant numbers: 2817HS016, 2817HS013). Institutional Review Board Statement: The animal study protocol was approved by the Ethical Com- mittee for Animal Experiments of the Government of Upper Bavaria, Munich, Germany (reference number ROB-55.2-2532.Vet_02-19-11). Informed Consent Statement: Not applicable. Data Availability Statement: Not applicable. Acknowledgments: The authors are very grateful for the support of all participants. A special thank you to all our project partners who made the publication of this paper possible. Invaluable was the help from the staff at our department in setting up, maintaining, and cleaning the camera and arena equipment. Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results. References 1. Raja, S.N.; Carr, D.B.; Cohen, M.; Finnerup, N.B.; Flor, H.; Gibson, S.; Keefe, F.J.; Mogil, J.S.; Ringkamp, M.; Sluka, K.A.; et al. The revised International Association for the Study of Pain definition of pain: Concepts, challenges, and compromises. Pain 2020, 161, 1976–1982. [CrossRef] 2. Ison, S.; Rutherford, K. Attitudes of farmers and veterinarians towards pain and the use of pain relief in pigs. Vet. J. 2014, 202, 622–627. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 3. TierSchG. Tierschutzgesetz, Neugefasst Durch Bek. v. 18.5.2006 I 1206, 1313; Zuletzt Geändert Durch Art. 280 V v. 19.6.2020 I 1328. 2020. Available online: