-IODIO,This was done by first washing the whole area with antibacterial soap (DOC GARDENING S.r.l., Genova (GE), Italy) to eliminate large contaminant particles, followed SCRUB PVP-IODIO, GARDENING by…
Ziboni Technology S.r.l.
Filters
stered singleSesto in a Italia, Fiorentino IV bolus. (FI), Sedation Italyachieved was ) and 0.01withmg/kg1 mg/kg of Azaperone of detomidine (Stresnil, (Detonervin, Elanco Italia Ecuphar Italia, S.p.A.S…
…Prague, Czech Republic; citek@af.czu.cz 6 Institute for Food and Agriculture Research and Technology (IRTA), Product Quality Program, Finca Camps i Armet, 17121 Monells, Girona, Spain; maria.font@irta.cat…
…Prague, Czech Republic; citek@af.czu.cz 6 Institute for Food and Agriculture Research and Technology (IRTA), Product Quality Program, Finca Camps i Armet, 17121 Monells, Girona, Spain; maria.font@irta.cat…
, 45, 405–412. [CrossRef] 44. Coleman, G.; Rea, T.; Hall, M.; Sawyer, A.; Hemsworth, P.H. Multimedia training in the pig industry. Comput. Educ. 2001, 37, 257–271. [CrossRef] © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
, 45, 405–412. [CrossRef] 44. Coleman, G.; Rea, T.; Hall, M.; Sawyer, A.; Hemsworth, P.H. Multimedia training in the pig industry. Comput. Educ. 2001, 37, 257–271. [CrossRef] © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
e.git. Received: 15 February 2024; Accepted: 21 February 2025 References 1. Fao, F. Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations. Rome http://faostat.fao.org 2, (2018). 2. Suryawanshi, K. R. et al. Impact of wild prey availability on livestock predation by snow leopards. R Soc. Open Sci. 4, (2017). 3. Collins, L. M., Smith, L. M. & Review Smart agri-systems for the pig industry. Animal 16, (2022). 4. Bonneau Weiler. Pros and cons of alternatives to piglet castration: welfare, Boar taint, and other meat quality traits. Animals 9, 884 (2019). 5. Sutherland, M. A. Welfare implications of invasive piglet husbandry procedures, methods of alleviation and alternatives: a review. N. Z. Vet. J. 63, 52–57 (2015). 6. Von Borell, E. et al. Animal welfare implications of surgical castration and its alternatives in pigs. Animal 3 (11), 1488–1496 (2009). 7. Burkemper, M. C., Pairis-Garcia, M. D., Moraes, L. E., Park, R. M. & Moeller, S. J. Effects of oral meloxicam and topical Lidocaine on pain associated behaviors of piglets undergoing surgical castration. J. Appl. Anim. Welfare Sci. 23, 209–218 (2020). 8. Tomasevic, I. & Bahelka, I. Čandek-Potokar. Attitudes and Beliefs of Eastern European Consumers Towards Piglet Castration and Meat from Castrated Pigs (Elsevier, 2020). 9. Lin-Schilstra, L. & Ingenbleek, P. T. A scenario analysis for implementing immunocastration as a single solution for piglet castration. Animals 12 (13), 1625 (2022). 10. H.R.8994–118th Congress: Pigs and Public Health Act. julho 11). https:/ /www.cong ress.gov/ bill/118th-congress/house-bi