quoll

vocal response scores

10 results · hybrid · 740.33168ms

Filters
Piglets’ acute responses to local anesthetic injection and surgical castration: Effects of the injection method and interval between injection and castration 100%
Mathilde Coutant; Jens Malmkvist; Marianne Kaiser; Leslie Foldager; Mette S. Herskin · file · #97

ts.2022.1009858 TABLE 5 Averages (±SE) of vocal parameters recorded during castration. IF IT SH F-test P Call proportion 2.5 min 0.61 ± 0.03b,1 0.59 ± 0.03b,1 0.43 ± 0.04b,2 F12,370 = 6.8 <0.001 b b b 5 min 0.59 ± 0.03 0.60 ± 0.03 0.51 ± 0.07 10 min 0.55 ± 0.03b,1 0.58 ± 0.02b,1/2 0.44 ± 0.05b,2 30 min 0.60 ± 0.03b,1 0.66 ± 0.03ab,1 0.43 ± 0.04b,2 a a CC 0.72 ± 0.02 0.72 ± 0.02 0.72 ± 0.02a Call per second 2.5 min 0.87 ± 0.051 0.87 ± 0.051 0.68 ± 0.05b,2 F12,363 = 6.7 <0.001 5 min 0.91 ± 0.041 0.89 ± 0.051 0.63 ± 0.07b,2 10 min 0.95 ± 0.041 0.94 ± 0.031 0.69 ± 0.07b,2 1 1 30 min 0.94 ± 0.04 0.87 ± 0.04 0.64 ± 0.05b,2 CC 0.92 ± 0.04 0.92 ± 0.04 0.92 ± 0.04a Mean call duration (s) 2.5 min 0.75 ± 0.05ab,1 0.70 ± 0.05abc,2 0.63 ± 0.04b,2 F12,364 = 2.4 0.006 5 min 0.70 ± 0.05bc 0.70 ± 0.05b 0.81 ± 0.11b 10 min 0.60 ± 0.04c 0.62 ± 0.03c 0.67 ± 0.08b bc,2 ab,1 30 min 0.68 ± 0.04 0.81 ± 0.05 0.68 ± 0.05b,2 a a CC 0.82 ± 0.04 0.82 ± 0.04 0.82 ± 0.04a b,1 b,1 Mean energy (dB) 2.5 min 34.58 ± 15.75 52.37 ± 16.6 0.15 ± 15.52b,2 F12,358 = 4.8 <0.001 5 min 25.88 ± 16.43b 29.59 ± 18.05b 42.88 ± 29.40b 10 min 19.28 ± 19.23b 12.93 ± 11.93b −2.34 ± 21.16b b,1 b,1 30 min 50.27 ± 18.81 59.10 ± 18.68 6.74 ± 15.40b,2 a a CC 131.20 ± 16.32 131.20 ± 16.32 131.20 ± 16.32a ab,1 b,1 Max energy (dB) 2.5 min 299.20 ± 16.71 302.53 ± 15.36 244.89 ± 18.90b,2 F12,359 = 3.5 <0.001 bc b 5 min 273.55 ± 18.78 285.58 ± 19.65 271.39 ± 24.91b 10 min 265.70 ± 20.45c 268.42 ± 17.46b 250.20 ± 26.68b 30 min 292.07 ± 18.28bc,1 302.51 ± 14.16ab,1 243.05 ± 18.59b,2 CC 349.24 ± 11.32a 349.24 ± 11.32a 349.24 ± 11.32a ab,1 b,1/2 Max power (dB) 2.5 min −15.22 ± 1.52 −15.20 ± 1.34 −20.20 ± 1.79b,2 F12,359 = 3.2 0.002 c b 5 min

Piglets’ acute responses to local anesthetic injection and surgical castration: Effects of the injection method and interval between injection and castration 100%
Mathilde Coutant; Jens Malmkvist; Marianne Kaiser; Leslie Foldager; Mette S. Herskin · file · #30

ts.2022.1009858 TABLE 5 Averages (±SE) of vocal parameters recorded during castration. IF IT SH F-test P Call proportion 2.5 min 0.61 ± 0.03b,1 0.59 ± 0.03b,1 0.43 ± 0.04b,2 F12,370 = 6.8 <0.001 b b b 5 min 0.59 ± 0.03 0.60 ± 0.03 0.51 ± 0.07 10 min 0.55 ± 0.03b,1 0.58 ± 0.02b,1/2 0.44 ± 0.05b,2 30 min 0.60 ± 0.03b,1 0.66 ± 0.03ab,1 0.43 ± 0.04b,2 a a CC 0.72 ± 0.02 0.72 ± 0.02 0.72 ± 0.02a Call per second 2.5 min 0.87 ± 0.051 0.87 ± 0.051 0.68 ± 0.05b,2 F12,363 = 6.7 <0.001 5 min 0.91 ± 0.041 0.89 ± 0.051 0.63 ± 0.07b,2 10 min 0.95 ± 0.041 0.94 ± 0.031 0.69 ± 0.07b,2 1 1 30 min 0.94 ± 0.04 0.87 ± 0.04 0.64 ± 0.05b,2 CC 0.92 ± 0.04 0.92 ± 0.04 0.92 ± 0.04a Mean call duration (s) 2.5 min 0.75 ± 0.05ab,1 0.70 ± 0.05abc,2 0.63 ± 0.04b,2 F12,364 = 2.4 0.006 5 min 0.70 ± 0.05bc 0.70 ± 0.05b 0.81 ± 0.11b 10 min 0.60 ± 0.04c 0.62 ± 0.03c 0.67 ± 0.08b bc,2 ab,1 30 min 0.68 ± 0.04 0.81 ± 0.05 0.68 ± 0.05b,2 a a CC 0.82 ± 0.04 0.82 ± 0.04 0.82 ± 0.04a b,1 b,1 Mean energy (dB) 2.5 min 34.58 ± 15.75 52.37 ± 16.6 0.15 ± 15.52b,2 F12,358 = 4.8 <0.001 5 min 25.88 ± 16.43b 29.59 ± 18.05b 42.88 ± 29.40b 10 min 19.28 ± 19.23b 12.93 ± 11.93b −2.34 ± 21.16b b,1 b,1 30 min 50.27 ± 18.81 59.10 ± 18.68 6.74 ± 15.40b,2 a a CC 131.20 ± 16.32 131.20 ± 16.32 131.20 ± 16.32a ab,1 b,1 Max energy (dB) 2.5 min 299.20 ± 16.71 302.53 ± 15.36 244.89 ± 18.90b,2 F12,359 = 3.5 <0.001 bc b 5 min 273.55 ± 18.78 285.58 ± 19.65 271.39 ± 24.91b 10 min 265.70 ± 20.45c 268.42 ± 17.46b 250.20 ± 26.68b 30 min 292.07 ± 18.28bc,1 302.51 ± 14.16ab,1 243.05 ± 18.59b,2 CC 349.24 ± 11.32a 349.24 ± 11.32a 349.24 ± 11.32a ab,1 b,1/2 Max power (dB) 2.5 min −15.22 ± 1.52 −15.20 ± 1.34 −20.20 ± 1.79b,2 F12,359 = 3.2 0.002 c b 5 min

Optimal methods of documenting analgesic efficacy in neonatal piglets undergoing castration 49%
Meredith Sheil; Adam Polkinghorne · file · #93

uring surgical castration, (ii) can be moderated with the use of anaesthesia and; (iii) are considered 52 to be indicative of pain (Table 3). Although piglets commonly vocalise when they are handled, and 53 particularly when restrained, the literature shows that during castration piglets may squeal more 54 often, more loudly and/or at a higher frequency than piglets that undergo sham handling[46,60-62]. 55 Castration is reported to produce changes in piglet vocalisation sound parameters that are 56 comprehensively different to those detected from handling alone[32]. A wide range of parameters 57 have been employed to measure piglet vocal response including measurement of; duration, energy 58 or loudness (dB), peak frequency or pitch (Hz), or highest energy (Hz), vocalisation rate, and/or the 59 percent of piglets that vocalised. Parameters that describe a single event in a call, such as peak level 60 or peak frequency are considered to provide more consistent results than parameters that describe 61 an average, such as weighted frequency and main frequency[63]. Most recently, specifically designed 62 software (Stremodo® (Stress Monitor and Documentation unit) has been developed to detect stress 63 vocalisations in piglets[64,65]. This uses linear prediction analysis[66] to extract features of calls and 64 categorise them as stress calls, non-stress calls or background noise. 65 66 Studies have reported that piglets during castration produced more high-frequency calls (>1000 67 Hz), (referred to as screams [63]), than non-castrated controls. Pulling and severing of the spermatic 68 cords lead to the greatest vocalisation response, greater than those normally emitted during handling 69 and restraint as well as during the initial incision [63,67]. Vocalisation responses

Topical wound anaesthesia: efficacy to mitigate piglet castration pain 18%
ML Sheil; M Chambers; B Sharpe · file · #65

…Group mean nociceptive motor response scores from video assessment (numerical rating scale) of motor response to castration procedures in Tri-Solfen or placebo-treated piglets Group Treatment Traction on Cut first Traction…

Load more results